User talk:JoshuacUK

This user may have left Wikipedia. JoshuacUK has not edited Wikipedia since November 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xanaduoutside80s.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xanaduoutside80s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Powerbook190.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Powerbook190.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:OrchardSquareSheffield.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OrchardSquareSheffield.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Super-Grammaticam listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Super-Grammaticam. Since you had some involvement with the Super-Grammaticam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MSJapan (talk) 17:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Aquinas Dumb Ox listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thomas Aquinas Dumb Ox. Since you had some involvement with the Thomas Aquinas Dumb Ox redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New York Times/Associated Press listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New York Times/Associated Press. Since you had some involvement with the New York Times/Associated Press redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JoshuacUK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thompson and Morgan

The article Thompson and Morgan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monkey Shines (video game)

The article Monkey Shines (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article's topic is not notable at this point in time; additionally, the article has an insufficient amount of citations, has a high likelihood of original research, does not follow many Wikipedia layout guidelines, and is overall disorganised.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Matthew - (talk) 21:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 00:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reupload MacPaint 2.0 screnshot

Hi there, I noticed that a bot reduced the size of one of the images you uploaded, File:MacPaint 2.0 screenshot.png and unfortunately the bot reduced it to a size thats too hard to see and also deleted the original full size image. Can you reupload the original? RyDawg96 (talk) 04:23, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

British Airways Ads listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect British Airways Ads. Since you had some involvement with the British Airways Ads redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paul-Rand.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paul-Rand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mac Classic and SE Repair and Upgrade Secrets

The article Mac Classic and SE Repair and Upgrade Secrets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. Unreferenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. » Shadowowl | talk 10:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MAG Technology Co.

The article MAG Technology Co. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 18:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DMC DeLorean page Good Article nominee

I've requested the DMC DeLorean page be promoted to GA status. Myself and a few other editors have worked on it quite a bit in recent months. In reading the archives, it looks like you worked on this in the past and I invite you to review the page and its status.

Thank you.

Expandinglight5 (talk) 23:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Apple Inc.

Portal:Apple Inc., a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Apple Inc. and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Apple Inc. during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Apple Inc.

Portal:Apple Inc., a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Apple Inc. and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Apple Inc. during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of classic synthesizers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of classic synthesizers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of classic synthesizers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Popcornduff (talk) 08:48, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Claris Impact

The article Claris Impact has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Software fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FAR notice

I have nominated Macintosh Classic for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. b uidhe 05:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retail Importance Assessment

Hi JoshuacUK! Since you're a member of WikiProject: Retailing, wanted to let you know we're currently discussing importance assessment criteria for the project on the talk page. Thanks! Tfkalk (talk) 23:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paul-Rand.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paul-Rand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Apple Inc. SA

Template:Apple Inc. SA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Logic Spectacles

The article Logic Spectacles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this term is analyzed in scholarly works, or even defined in them. Fails WP:GNG, plus issues with WP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Logic Spectacles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logic Spectacles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logic Spectacles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Dead Mac Scrolls for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dead Mac Scrolls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dead Mac Scrolls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Imcdc (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flying Virus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flying Virus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Virus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 16:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CGlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CGlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of System suitcase

The article System suitcase has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

uncited since 2007 and too niche to be notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asia Commercial Co. Ltd.

The article Asia Commercial Co. Ltd. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Macintosh II Repair and Upgrade Secrets

The article Macintosh II Repair and Upgrade Secrets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK - no g.scholar results, google results are for full text, book dbs, etc. Not of lasting encyclopedic significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. asilvering (talk) 01:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Macintosh Repair & Upgrade Secrets

The article Macintosh Repair & Upgrade Secrets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK - no g.scholar results, google results are for full text, book dbs, etc. Not of lasting encyclopedic significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. asilvering (talk) 01:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]